Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Statistics Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Skald Aleonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,444

    Statistics Thread

    Hello Vikings,

    This thread is gonna be about statistics that come out of our Factions matches. You can throw in anything related that comes in mind.

    My first post is gonna be about the Kills & Matches of all my units/classes/ranks. I will post them here, and draw some conclusions at the end of the post. For the record, according to Steam achievements, I've played 906 battles by now, and won 726 (~80%) by now. In the Hall of Valor, I have won 158 out of the 241 (~66%) ranked/tourney battles I've fought. My best-ever & current Elo score is 1447 & 1382, respectively, and my best-ever win-streak is 18 (that was before the quick/ranked match split).

    Statistics:

    Note: If memory serves me right, all my units were hired with zero kills from the Mead-House. As grumpyoldman pointed out in post#6 in the thread, hiring "experienced" or "veteran" rank-0 units that come with 15 or 30 kills, can distort the following figures. Those kills should normally be subtracted from the kill-count, unless the number of battles and extra kills is large, e.g. over 500 battles or over 300 kills.

    Code:
    K = Kills
    B = Battles
    
    Class     K    B    K/B
    -----------------------
    BM (r1)  724  528  1.37    
    BM (r2)  234  186  1.26
    BM (r3)  190  169  1.12
    
    SA (r1)   85  226  0.38
    SA (r2)   67  177  0.38
    SA (r3)   46  102  0.45
    
    SS (r1)  321  287  1.12
    SS (r2)  110   93  1.18
    SS (r3)  102  102  1.00
    
    -----------------------
    
    BB (r1)   89  246  0.36
    BB (r2)   62  137  0.45
    BB (r3)   54  107  0.50
    
    RM (r1)  223  642  0.35
    RM (r2)  134  308  0.44
    RM (r3)   80  136  0.59
    
    TH (r1)  152  208  0.73
    TH (r2)   68  106  0.64
    TH (r3)   69   81  0.85
    
    -----------------------
    
    PK (r1)   32   66  0.48
    PK (r2)   24   38  0.63
    PK (r3)   60   92  0.65
    
    SM (r1)   36   79  0.46
    SM (r2)   23   55  0.42
    SM (r3)   52   91  0.57
    
    SRM(r1)  247  205  1.20
    SRM(r2)   66   64  1.03
    SRM(r3)  179  189  0.95
    
    -----------------------
    
    WH (r1)  411  279  1.47
    WH (r2)  184  153  1.20
    WH (r3)  293  223  1.31
    
    WL (r1)   31   41  0.76
    WL (r2)   41   43  0.95
    WL (r3)   46   56  0.82
    
    WM (r1)   78   78  1.00
    WM (r2)   81   69  1.17
    WM (r3)   88   63  1.40
    Remarks:
    The remarks that follow are highly dependent on my personal play-style and skill, but you might draw similar conclusions for yourselves, as some patterns emerge. The metric I will mostly used is "K/B" i.e. Kills/Battle (nothing to do with our four-times champ, K_B ). A unit with a high (low) K/B is one that has a "killer" (or "breaker/support") role in the teams it makes part of.

    • Most used classes are: BM, RM, SRM and WH.
    • Most used unit is my rank-1 RM (642 battles) followed by rank-1 BM (528 battles), while rank-1 WH & SS battle for third place far below (279 & 287 battles, respectively).
    • Least used classes are: WL, PK, SM & WM. Rank-1 PK & WL have just over 30 battles in their belts.
    • Deadliest class is WH (K/B > 1.3), closely followed by BM.
    • Least deadly class --indicating "breaker" or "support" units-- is SA and then BB (K/B ~ 0.4). My Shieldbangers, SM & PK, do a little better, with K/B~0.5.
    • Archers: For BM & SS, the K/B falls as the rank increases, probably due to me losing more often in high-power (p12) ranked/tourney matches, as compared to low-power (p6) QMs. The low K/B for SAs is evident of my use of them as front-line breakers rather than killers.
    • Raiders: K/B increases with rank, indicating that Raiders can "transform" from breakers to killers as their rank (and hence their "importance") in a build increases. Thrasher is by far the deadliest Raider-class, while RM and BB are comparable.
    • Shieldbangers: An obvious "role difference" emerges, comparing SRM to the other two SBs: the former is a killer while the latter are breaker/support units. Interestingly, my r3 SRM is less deadly than r1 SRM, probably related to me using him badly at higher-powers; another explanation could be that his r3-Ram ability makes him a good breaker, so I feel comfortable using him as a blocker & damage-sponge.
    • Warriors: Another "role difference" is evident, comparing WL to WH&WM: the former is a breaker/support unit, while the others are killers. WH is overall deadlier than WM, who is often used as an "unmaimable blocker" (thanks to SI ability) as we all know.


    I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on the above, as well as compare your stats to mine
    Last edited by Aleonymous; 08-07-2014 at 07:22 AM. Reason: added current Elo ; added a note
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

  2. #2
    Backer balnoisi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    135
    Here's my record, mostly played in 2013. Which is a pity, if the game was kept alive i would keep playing it every now and then.

    Steam Achievement Record :

    246 battles.
    228 battles won (93%).

    Hall of Valor Record :

    174 battles.
    160 battles won (92%).

    Highest ELO achieved : 1615. (current ELO 1569).
    Highest win streak : 42 battles.



    Unit Stats :

    Kills Battles %

    BowMaster r1 21 20 1.05
    BowMaster r2 62 53 1.16

    SiegeArcher r1 48 43 1.11
    SiegeArcher r2 169 169 1.00

    SkyStriker r1 42 40 1.05
    SkyStriker r2 38 29 1.31

    BackBiter r1 10 24 0.41
    BackBiter r2 91 133 0.68
    BackBiter r2 58 163 0.35

    RaidMaster r1 13 44 0.29

    Thrasher r1 114 156 0.73
    Thrasher r1 34 30 1.13
    Thrasher r2 81 79 1.02

    Provoker r1 15 19 0.78

    ShieldMaster r1 72 154 0.46
    ShieldMaster r1 5 18 0.27

    StrongArm r1 35 51 0.68

    WarHawk r1 51 25 2.04
    WarHawk r2 338 159 2.12

    WarMaster r1 15 20 0.75
    WarMaster r2 62 48 1.29



    Least used unit is the WarLeader, don't even have one.

    My most seasoned team would be composed of (in decreasing order) : SiegeArcher, BackBiter, WarHawk, Thrasher, ShieldMaster, BackBiter.

    Oldest units have seen 532 days in service.
    Last edited by balnoisi; 08-06-2014 at 06:16 PM. Reason: crap forum logs me out every minute, have to re-login and re-do.

  3. #3
    Skald Aleonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,444
    Quote Originally Posted by balnoisi View Post
    Here's my record, mostly played in 2013.

    [...]

    EDIT : it's the fourth time i'm logged out while editing the text, so i won't waste time no more. sorry to leave numbers like that but forum does not let me other choice.
    Thanks for sharing bal! I will provide some comments on the differences of our records:

    • Archers: Seems like your games were back before the SA-nerf, so it's to be expected that she's equally deadly compared to the other Archers. I also noticed your quite limited use of BMs. Maybe the weren't so popular, being the last of the three archers to come into the game?
    • Raiders: Only one RM, eh? I remember you saying that you consider them "your personal enemies"! I am somewhat surprised to see that your BBs have same deadliness as mine own, even though some of them should have seen a lot of pre-nerf battles (when BB's max-STR was 12 instead of 10). The deadliness of your most seasoned TH, the rank-1 one, is approximately the same as mine.
    • Shieldbangers: Your fav seems to be the SM, while your SRM is used far less than mine. Interestingly, PK is your least favorite SB; I always had you as the Provoker type!
    • Warriors: Wow, a lot of kills on those WHs! This supports the claim that WH is the single most powerful unit to keep healthy until late-game, "pillage-proof" etc. I would like to see K_B's WHs' stats, as he was another strong player that made very good use of this unit. No Warleader, eh? Understandable...


    EDIT: I've been suffering from forum issues too, but not of the type your seem to be having. In my case, I am unable to edit my previous posts, i.e. the text-box appears totally empty/blank. To counter this, I always draft my response in an external text-editor and copy-paste it over here only when I am done.
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

  4. #4
    Factions veteran stoicmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Oak Ridge, TN
    Posts
    290
    don't know how this will contribute to anything, but here goes: (kills then battles)
    Archer 883 (1395)
    Archer 144 (288)
    BM1 211 (170)
    BM1 417 (311)
    BM2 106 (75)
    BM2 151 (104)
    BM3 196 (117)
    BM3 171 (130)
    SA1 1644 (4417)
    SA1 1881 (4581)
    SA2 311 (1142)
    SA2 118 (455)
    SA2 293 (696)
    SA3 128 (350)
    SA3 162 (419)
    SA3 510 (1017)
    SS1 41 (28)
    SS1 23 (26)
    SS2 24 (20)
    SS2 33 (31)
    SS3 33 (24)
    SS3 102 (81)
    SS3 70 (54)
    BB1 85 (134)
    BB1 99 (123)
    BB2 15 (27)
    BB2 15 (43)
    BB3 94 (296)
    BB3 61 (256)
    Raider 705 (1133)
    Raider 946 (1412)
    RM1 100 (167)
    RM1 63 (118)
    RM1 21 (53)
    RM2 30 (71)
    RM2 29 (97)
    RM3 37 (53)
    RM3 32 (91)
    TH1 5243 (5033)
    TH1 5574 (5253)
    TH2 490 (746)
    TH2 442 (577)
    TH3 103 (190)
    TH3 80 (141)
    PVK1 14 (9)
    PVK1 10 (8)
    PVK2 19 (31)
    PVK2 21 (54)
    PVK3 39 (32)
    PVK3 31 (26)
    Shieldbanger 52 (37)
    SM1 76 (97)
    SM1 37 (39)
    SM2 34 (49)
    SM2 29 (18)
    SM3 72 (52)
    SM3 188 (115)
    SRM1 101 (73)
    SRM1 18 (11)
    SRM2 137 (98)
    SRM2 19 (34)
    SRM3 48 (147)
    SRM3 106 (242)
    WH1 6 (3)
    WH1 78 (88)
    WH2 57 (70)
    WH2 20 (39)
    WH3 36 (109)
    WH3 110 (244)
    WL1 2337 (1860)
    WL1 12 (8)
    WL2 19 (56)
    WL3 30 (65)
    WM1 5040 (3813)
    WM1 3581 (2656)
    WM2 1150 (859)
    WM2 1174 (867)
    WM3 1081 (891)
    WM3 169 (137)
    Warrior 515 (424)
    Warrior 3064 (2562)

    Apparently during my first year, I played a different set-up or set-ups and don't remember that or those. Maybe somebody has a stream or twitch of those early days. The War Leader was a killer and obviously earned some important achievements! I finally settled on my consistent team of SA SA TH TH WM WM. When I play at all power levels now, my lineup remains archer archer raider raider warrior warrior. I mix up ranks among this line up depending upon what power level I am matching, but throw in 2 SA3's whenever possible. I usually keep TH1's in this mix and either add WM1's, WM2's or WM3's to complete the power level. I have had some success with RM RM SM SM BM BM. I'm just a 2x2x2 kind of girl What this proves though, is that anyone can have a degree of success in Factions if one is willing to battle on. Skal!!
    Last edited by stoicmom; 08-06-2014 at 01:46 PM. Reason: added number of battles to each unit

  5. #5
    Skald Aleonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,444
    Quote Originally Posted by stoicmom View Post
    don't know how this will contribute to anything, but here goes:
    ...
    SA1 1644 (4417) --> K/B = 0.37
    SA1 1881 (4581) --> K/B = 0.41
    TH1 5243 (5033) --> K/B = 1.04
    TH1 5574 (5253) --> K/B = 1.06
    WM1 5040 (3813) --> K/B = 1.32
    WM1 3581 (2656) --> K/B = 1.35
    ...
    WL1 2337 (1860) --> K/B = 1.26
    ...
    Apparently during my first year, I played a different set-up or set-ups and don't remember that or those. Maybe somebody has a stream or twitch of those early days. The War Leader was a killer and obviously earned some important achievements! I finally settled on my consistent team of SA SA TH TH WM WM. When I play at all power levels now, my lineup remains archer archer raider raider warrior warrior. I mix up ranks among this line up depending upon what power level I am matching, but throw in 2 SA3's whenever possible. I usually keep TH1's in this mix and either add WM1's or WM2's to complete the power level. I have had some success with RM RM SM SM BM BM. I'm just a 2x2x2 kind of girl What this proves though, is that anyone can have a degree of success in Factions if one is willing to battle on. Skal!!
    Thanks for the update, stoicmom. Now, some more interesting conclusions can be drawn, because, in my opinion, it's the ratio K/B={Kills-over-Battles} that mainly tells us if you use a unit as a "Breaker/Support" or a "Killer".

    Lets see:
    • Your trademark "red build" [2SA 2TS 2WM], power-6, has killed over 20,000 units That's 20,000 Renown on its own, i.e. about twice the worth of my whole barracks and wallet together!
    • Summing the Kills/Battle of your six "red build" unit yields 5.5. Taking into account that enemy team has 6 units, and assuming that most of those units' battles were played together (i.e. in the same p6 "red build"), leads to the interesting conclusion that your build has a ~90% (=5.5/6) win-percentage! That claim can be cross-checked with other players that have been known to use the same build/units consistently, e.g. K_B or bonaparte48. Especially the latter played only p6 Ranked matches using always and only [3TS 2SM BM].
    • I was quite surprised to see that you used a WL so much! His K/B ratio is quite high, over 1.25, a lot higher than mine and grumpy's.
    • Your rank-0 guys also have a lot of kills on them... Poor noobs! But, your rank-0 archers all have a quite small K/B ratio, indicating that you probably use them as SAs: front-line, fearless breakers!
    • Your WHs are obviously utilized differently from the rest of us (me, balnoisi and grumpyoldman, so far), as they all have a quite lowl K/B<0.6, on average.
    • Your BMs, especially the high-rank ones, are very deadly indeed; well done, stoicmom! I hope there's no typos on the figures there
    • The rest of your units follow the same patterns as ours, more or less. I also noted how your SRM's K/B changes with rank like mine, i.e. at rank-1 he is a "killer" and at rank-3 he is a "breaker/support" unit.


    See? "Show me your barracks and I'll tell you who you are"
    Last edited by Aleonymous; 08-07-2014 at 07:07 AM.
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

  6. #6
    Greetings!

    The post will follow Aleo's pattern.

    I've fought a total amount of 651 matches, 137 of them being recorded in the Hall of Valour (21%). I won about 70% of the matches and 61% of the ranked/tourney games. My current ELO score is 1320, fourty points below my best at 1360 going along with a winstreak of 12.

    The Statistics:

    Code:
    K = Kills
    B = Battles
    
    Class   K    B     K/B
    -----------------------
    BM (r1)  170  162  1.05
    BM (r1)  253  265  0.95
    ---      
    BM (r2)  174  149  1.17
    BM (r2)  264  223  1.18
    BM (r2)   42   36  1.17
    ---    
    BM (r3)   47   11  4.27 (1.54)
    
    BM total 950  846  1.12
    
    SA (r1)   11   16  0.68
    SA (r1)   24   46  0.52
    SA (r3)   43   85  0.51
    
    SS (r1)   11    4  2.75
    SS (r1)    9    6  1.50
    ---
    SS (r2)   30    1  (0)
    SS (r3)   99  108  0.92
    SS (r3)  188  175  1.07
    ---
    
    SS total 307 293 1.05
    -----------------------
    
    BB (r1)   10   28  0.36
    BB (r1)   10   44  0.23
    BB (r2)   47  144  0.33
    BB (r2)   16   38  0.42
    BB (r3)   40  156  0.27
    
    BB total: 123  410  0.30
    
    RM (r1)   16   21  0.76
    RM (r1)   37   94  0.39
    RM (r1)   89  256  0.34
    RM (r2)   54  104  0.52
    RM (r2)   91  122  0.75
    RM (r3)   24   51  0.47
    
    RM total 311  648  0.48 
    
    TH (r1)   13   16  0.81
    TH (r2)   55   64  0.86
    TH (r2)   62   78  0.79
    TH (r3)  100  108  0.93
    
    -----------------------
    
    PK (r1)    7   26  0.27
    PK (r1)   30   48  0.63
    PK (r2)   33   13  2.54 (? 0.23 / 2.15)
    PK (r3)   61   63  0.97 (? 0.49)
    
    SM (r1)    7   14  0.50
    SM (r2)   20   76  0.26
    SM (r3)   59  133  0.44
    SM (r3)   39   13  3.00 (0.69)
    
    SRM(r1)   28   22  1.27
    SRM(r2)   26   44  0.59
    SRM(r3)  178  130  1.37
    
    -----------------------
    
    WH (r1)  147   82  1.79
    WH (r2)   52   27  1.93
    WH (r3)  233  155  1.50
    
    WL (r1)   12   12  1.00
    WL (r2)  107   99  1.08
    WL (r3)  233  211  1.09
    
    WM (r1)   43   32  1.34
    WM (r2)   24   18  1.33
    WM (r3)   103  82  1.26
    Remarks:

    We got some suspect outliers with a r3BM, r2SS and r2, maybe r3PK, r3SM. This comes from buying the units as veterans with 30 kills in their backpack from the meadhouse. For example: I figured the r2SS useless, i just bought him for a Rensei-battle, providing now a 30.00 k/b...

    • Favourite classes: BM RM BB WL. Meeting grumpyoldman means meeting Bowmasters (1.3 per battle) & Raidmasters (1.0 per battle) !
    • favourite unit: r1 BM, closely followed by r1 RM
    • deadliest unit: The WH, who would've guessed?
    • Archers: I'm actually surprised how close the SS comes up to the k/b ratio of the BM. But i also figured: There is still room for improvement for my BM's.
    • Raiders: Nothing extraodinary here!
    • Shieldbangers: Besides veryfying the role-difference between SM+PK towards the SRM im quite shocked that my SRM seems to be even deadlier than the WM. I guess that comes from playing him at position 6 with 14/15 ARM/STR at r3...From the high varation in the k/b ratio you can tell that I tried to experiment with all of them as Warriors.
    • Warriors: The WL is my most used Warrior! This might explain the slightly higher k/b ratio in comparison to Aleonymous WL.
    Last edited by grumpyoldman; 08-07-2014 at 05:49 PM. Reason: added cleaned k/b for r3 PK

  7. #7
    Skald Aleonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,444
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpyoldman View Post

    We got some suspect outliers with a r3BM, r2SS and r2, maybe r3PK, r3SM. This comes from buying the units as veterans with 30 kills in their backpack from the meadhouse. For example: I figured the r2SS useless, i just bought him for a Rensei-battle, providing now a 30.00 k/b...

    • Favourite classes: BM RM BB WL. Meeting grumpyoldman means meeting Bowmasters (1.3 per battle) & Raidmasters (1.0 per battle) !
    • favourite unit: r1 BM, closely followed by r1 RM
    • deadliest unit: The WH, who would've guessed?
    • Archers: I'm actually surprised how close the SS comes up to the k/b ratio of the BM. But i also figured: There is still room for improvement for my BM's.
    • Raiders: Nothing extraodinary here!
    • Shieldbangers: Besides veryfying the role-difference between SM+PK towards the SRM im quite shocked that my SRM seems to be even deadlier than the WM. I guess that comes from playing him at position 6 with 14/15 ARM/STR at r3...From the high varation in the k/b ratio you can tell that I tried to experiment with all of them as Warriors.
    • Warriors: The WL is my most used Warrior! This might explain the slightly higher k/b ratio in comparison to Aleonymous WL.
    Thanks for posting, as well as for the remark on hiring units with kills from the Mead-House, grumpy! I now clarified this in my post too: I am pretty certain that all my rank-0 units were purchased "unbloodied" (i.e. virgins)

    Some more comments:
    • Quite a few of your units have a one-digit number of fights or kills, thus making the statistics "unconverged".
    • Our favourite units are pretty much the same: RM & BM. Then, I go for the "standards": WH & SRM, while you go for the "underdogs": BB & WL
    • It's quite surprising that 50% of the guys that listed their stats so far (you & stoicmom -vs- me & balnoisi) use a WL so much! KamikazeDurrrp would eat his hat Also, all your WLs have K/B>1.00, contrary to mine; maybe I should rethink my approach of using them in silly backfiring FA-combos or as suboptimal 4AB-breakers... =/
    • Your BBs die a lot and your WHs kill a lot! Actually, most of your figures are more "polarized" (too low or too high) compared to mine, something that probably means that your units' roles are much "stricter" than mine.
    • Your Raiders' K/B doesn't follow the same trend as mine, i.e. their K/B doesn't increase with rank. Also, you've got some deviations within the same class&rank, e.g. your three rank-1 RMs K/B ranges from 0.35 to 0.75! That is a clear mark of the versatility of that particular unit, being used equally well as a breaker (or bait) and as a "late-game sweeper".
    • Interesting "singularity" for your rank-2 SRM, who has a distinctly different K/B than you r1 and r3 ones!
    • Finally, is the K/B score for your rank-3 PK correct? I am suspecting that it infected by that "hired-with-kills" issue... If not, well, that's good use of that Varl! I like him statted at 16ARM/12STR/3AB which makes him a real tough nut if left un-harassed until the end
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

  8. #8
    Backer Abel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    France
    Posts
    14
    Nice thread !
    I don't have enough playtime yet, but I want to keep notes about the units I recruited with kills for later.
    5 kills:
    - Raidmaster
    - Warleader
    - Provoker
    - Starting units (I don't remember which; I dismissed one)
    - Trasher x 2
    - Warhawk
    - Strongarm
    Last edited by Abel; 08-12-2014 at 02:45 AM.

  9. #9
    here we go...

    Code:
    B:642
    W:422
    BWS:25
    BE:1541
    CE: 1490
    
    
    ----------------
    Class     K      B   
    ----------------
    Archer 172 142
    Archer 179 169 
    
    BM (r1)  2062  1321  
    BM (r1)  288  250      
    BM (r2)  89  60
    BM (r2)  292  200
    BM (r3)  87  35
    
    SA (r1)   42 50
    SA (r1)   245 325
    SA (r1)   167 227
    SA (r2)   81 129
    SA (r2)   90 119
    SA (r3)   58 47
    
    SS (r1)  286 199	
    SS (r2)  39 43
    SS (r2)  121 100
    SS (r3)  50 57
    SS (r3)  158 130
    
    -----------------------
    Raider 104 272
    Raider 112 241 
    Raider 92 235 
    
    BB (r1)   225 331
    BB (r1)   99 205
    BB (r2)   32 81
    BB (r2)   117 188
    BB (r3)   54 67
    
    RM (r1)  194 431
    RM (r1)  174 298
    RM (r1)  179 267
    RM (r2)  162 213
    RM (r2)  110 156
    RM (r2)  60 61
    RM (r3)   45 15
    RM (r3)   53 32
    
    TH (r1)  368 495
    TH (r1)  315 366
    TH (r1)  171 201
    
    TH (r2)   129 201
    TH (r2)   93 110
    TH (r2)   95 104
    TH (r3)   107 95
    TH (r3)   59 111
    TH (r3)   40 21
    
    -----------------------
    Shieldbanger 59 99
    
    PK (r1)   22 35
    PK (r1)   71 139
    PK (r2)   62 142
    PK (r3)   132 168
    PK (r3)   59 62
    
    SM (r1)   50 207
    SM (r1)   142 445
    SM (r2)   53 74
    SM (r2)   33 139
    SM (r3)   50 54
    
    SRM(r1)  311 260
    SRM(r2)   192 173
    SRM(r3)  196 171
    SRM(r3)  46 33
    -----------------------
    
    WH (r1)  467 336
    WH (r2)  110 65
    WH (r3)  62 27
    
    WL (r1)   37 42
    WL (r1)   84 73
    WL (r2)   34 7
    WL (r3)   82 53
    
    WM (r1)   403 445
    WM (r1)   140 127
    WM (r2)   99 69
    WM (r2)   120 109	
    WM (r3)   105 77
    WM (r3)   42 20

  10. #10
    K = Kills
    B = Battles

    Class K B K/B
    -----------------------
    BM (r1) 187 123 1.52
    BM (r2) 84 97 0.86
    SA (r1) 67 66 1.01
    SS (r1) 45 30 1.50
    SS (r2) 81 81 1

    -----------------------

    BB (r1) 23 65 0.35
    BB (r2) 32 90 0.35
    RM (r1) 161 340 0.47
    TH (r1) 95 137 0.69
    TH (r2) 29 51 0.56

    -----------------------

    PK (r1) 119 122 0.97
    SM (r1) 20 31 0.64
    SM (r2) 27 47 0.57
    SRM(r1) 79 102 0.77

    -----------------------

    WH (r1) 11 5 2.2
    WH (r2) 90 83 1.08
    WL (r1) 15 15 1
    WM (r1) 85 95 0.89


    My two penn'orth.
    Last edited by Yngvar; 08-11-2014 at 06:16 PM.

  11. #11
    Skald Aleonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,444
    Quote Originally Posted by Abel View Post
    I don't have enough playtime yet, but I want to keep notes about the units I recruited with kills for later.
    Yes, you need a lot of matches & kills to make any viable statistics. If you're up to it, you could try recording how much damage each of your units outputs, and which ones actually survive the battles you win. It does get tedious though, especially if the fights are tight...

    Quote Originally Posted by visorium View Post
    here we go...
    Visor's stats resemble a lot to grumpy's and mine: Your fav unit is (by far) your rank-1 BM! Your favorite Warrior is WH, while WL is very little used. Your Strongarms are equally deadly as mine... The only "discrepancy" I noted, is the difference in K/B between your two rank-3 Thrashers... Different roles?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yngvar View Post
    My two penn'orth.
    Your favorite Varl is the PK, with just one battle less than your BM?!? That's quite unexpected! Also, that PK has a very high deadliness, with K/B~1. Interesting, indeed. Your favorite unit is the RM, and the least used is the WL, another pair of typical trends
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

  12. #12
    "Fortuneteller was wrong", my favorite Warrior p1WM - 445 battles/p1WH 336. but Warhawk (467 kills) a bit more lethal than Warmaster (403 kills).
    I myself was surprised after see p3TS and WL statistic
    PS: After that I fired two TS, and raised my SB to p3STR (my tourney build).
    So I hired two SB more, one of them allready raised to p1STR.
    Here are the results of the exciting skulls counting
    Last edited by visorium; 08-19-2014 at 11:39 PM.

  13. #13
    Skald Aleonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,444
    Quote Originally Posted by visorium View Post
    "Fortuneteller was wrong", my favorite Warrior p1WM - 445 battles/p1WH 336. but Warhawk (467 kills) a bit more lethal than Warmaster (403 kills).

    I myself was surprised after see p3TS statistic [...] After that I fired two TS [...]
    I stand corrected Your favorite rank-1 WM is sub-optimal, it seems. You only Warrior to have a K/B less than 1.00 (along with a WL)

    Poor Thrashers got fired... Those blonde guys could be looking for me, seeing that I caused their turmoil!

    One question: Do you often hire experienced or veteran units from Mead-Hall? Those "off-the-shelf" kills could mess up your numbers, like they did grumpy's.

    ...I wish we had a stat telling how many battles each unit has actually survived... That was quite simple to record, really...
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

  14. #14
    infoOne question: Do you often hire experienced or veteran units from Mead-Hall? Those "off-the-shelf" kills could mess up your numbers, like they did grumpy's.

  15. #15
    Skald Aleonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    2,444
    I almost never hired experienced/veteran units from Mead Hall. But that was when you could get plenty of matches and amass the required kills (and Renown) in a few days. But, you're right -- paying the "iron price" is not the same as paying the "gold price"
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •